LAPAROSKOPIK SIMULYATORLARNING TA’LIM JARAYONIDA QO‘LLA
##semicolon##
laparoskopik xirurgiya##common.commaListSeparator## simulyatorlar##common.commaListSeparator## simulyatsiya asosida ta’lim##common.commaListSeparator## klinik xavfsizlikAbstrak
Laparoskopik xirurgiya zamonaviy minimal invaziv tibbiyotning eng jadal rivojlanayotgan yo‘nalishlaridan biri hisoblanadi. So‘nggi o‘n yilliklarda laparoskopik amaliyotlar umumiy xirurgiyada standart usul sifatida joriy etildi. Laparoskopik operatsiyalar ochiq jarrohlik usullariga nisbatan kam travmatiklik, operatsiyadan keyingi og‘riq sindromining pastligi, infektsion asoratlar xavfining kamayishi, gospitalizatsiya muddatining qisqarishi va bemorlarning tez reabilitatsiya qilinishi bilan tavsiflanadi. Biroq laparoskopik xirurgiya jarrohdan yuqori darajada maxsus texnik, vizual-motor va kognitiv ko‘nikmalarni talab qiladi. Ikki o‘lchamli monitor orqali ishlash, instrumentlar bilan masofaviy manipulyatsiya qilish, taktil sezgining cheklanganligi va fazoviy orientatsiya qiyinchiliklari klinik amaliyotda xatolar xavfini oshiradi. Shu sababli zamonaviy xirurgik talimda laparoskopik simulyatorlardan foydalanish bemor xavfsizligini taminlash va jarrohlarni klinik amaliyotga bosqichma-bosqich tayyorlashda asosiy o‘rin tutadi. Ushbu obzor maqolada laparoskopik simulyatorlarning tarixiy rivojlanishi, turlari, talim jarayonida qo‘llanilishi, simulyatsiya asosida tayyorgarlikning klinik xavfsizlik va operatsiya natijalarini yaxshilashga tasiri zamonaviy ilmiy dalillar asosida keng qamrovda tahlil qilinadi
##submission.citations##
1. Aggarwal R. Simulation in residency training. British Journal of Surgery. 2021;108:901–908.
2. Aggarwal R. Simulation-based training and assessment. British Journal of Surgery. 2021;108:901–908.
3. Aggarwal R., Mytton O.T. Training and simulation for patient safety. British Journal of Surgery. 2019;106(2):110–118.
4. Barsuk J.H. Simulation-based education outcomes. JAMA Surgery. 2021;156:355–362.
5. Birkmeyer J.D. Surgical skill and patient outcomes. Annals of Surgery. 2020;272:205–211.
6. Cook D.A. Comparative effectiveness of simulation. Medical Education. 2022;56:585–599.
7. Grantcharov T.P., Boillat T., Elkabany S. Patient safety and surgical simulation. Annals of Surgery. 2019;270(2):247–252.
8. Grantcharov T.P., Stefanidis D. Competency-based surgical education. Annals of Surgery. 2024;279:401–408.
9. Hashimoto D.A. Artificial intelligence in surgery. Annals of Surgery. 2019;270:412–421.
10. Marcus H.J. Virtual reality in modern surgery. Annals of Surgery. 2023;278:e45–e47.
11. McGaghie W.C. Outcomes of mastery learning. Academic Medicine. 2021;96:989–995.
12. McGaghie W.C. Simulation-based mastery learning. Academic Medicine. 2020;95(6):843–852.
13. Palter V.N. Future of surgical education. Lancet. 2023;401:1601–1603.
14. Stefanidis D. Proficiency-based progression training. Annals of Surgery. 2020;272(3):401–407.
15. Stefanidis D. Simulation in residency programs. Journal of Surgical Education. 2023;80:215–223.
16. Stefanidis D., Sevdalis N. Simulation in surgery: Past, present and future. Surgical Endoscopy. 2019;33(11):3431–3440.
17. Ismailov U.S. Batirov D.Y. Rakhimov A.P. Allanazarov A.K. Umarov Z.Z. Sheniyazov S.S. Rojobov R.R. MOLECULAR GENETIC ASSOCIATION OF SIMULTAN PATHOLOGIES GALLSTONE DISEASE AND METABOLIC SYNDROME International Medical Scientific Journal Art Of Medicine. Volume 3. Issue 1. ISBN 978-0-578-26510-0. Pages 286-292 18. Ismailov, O. S., Batirov, D. Y., Rakhimov, A. P., Azadov, B. R., & Yusupov, D. D. (2022). MOLECULAR GENETIC INTERRELATION OF GALLSTONE DISEASE AND METABOLIC SYNDROME. New Day in Medicine 9 (47), 514-519.
19. Van Hove P.D. Validity of laparoscopic simulators. Surgical Endoscopy. 2021;35:2729–2738.
