СОВРЕМЕННЫЕ ИНФОРМАЦИОННЫЕ ТЕХНОЛОГИИ В ДИАГНОСТИКЕ ЗАБОЛЕВАНИЙ МУЖСКОЙ СЕКСУАЛЬНОЙ И РЕПРОДУКТИВНОЙ СИСТЕМ: ЛИТЕРАТУРНЫЙ ОБЗОР
Kalit so‘zlar:
сунъий интеллект, машинавий ўқитиш, эректил дисфункция, эркаклар бепуштлиги, сперма таҳлили'Abstrak
Долзарблиги. Эректил дисфункция (ЭД) ва эркаклар бепуштлиги бутун дунёда юз миллионлаб эркакларга таъсир кўрсатадиган энг кенг тарқалган урологик патологиялар қаторига киради. Рақамли технологиялар, машинавий ўқитиш ва сунъий интеллект (СИ) ривожланиши уларни эрта ва аниқ ташхислаш учун янги имкониятлар очди.
Мақсад. ЭД ва эркаклар бепуштлиги ташхисида ИТ-ечимлар — машинавий ўқитиш алгоритмлари, компьютерли кўриш тизимлари, тақиладиган қурилмалар ва катта тил моделлари (LLM) асосидаги чат-ботлар қўлланилишига оид долзарб маълумотларни тизимлаштириш.
Усуллар. PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science ва Google Scholar маълумотлар базалари бўйича 2019–2025 йиллардаги адабиётларнинг нарратив (тавсифий) шарҳи.
Натижалар. Машинавий ўқитиш алгоритмлари (XGBoost, SVM, тасодифий ўрмон) стандарт биокимёвий ва клиник маълумотлар асосида ЭДни ташхислашда юқори аниқликни кўрсатмоқда; янги авлод тақиладиган сенсорлари тунги эрекцияларни уй шароитида ишончли мониторинг қилишни таъминлайди; спермани таҳлил қилувчи СИ тизимлари сперматозоидлар ҳаракатчанлигини баҳолашда 89,9% гача аниқликка эришмоқда. ChatGPT ва Google Gemini базасидаги чат-ботлар беморларга ЭД ҳақида долзарб ва тушунарли маълумотларни тақдим этишга қодир, бироқ қатор клиник тавсияларнинг аниқлиги бўйича экспертлардан ортда қолмоқда.
Хулоса. Клиник амалиётга ИТ-воситаларини интеграция қилиш эркаклар репродуктив саломатлиги ташхисининг қулайлиги ва сифатини сезиларли даражада ошириши мумкин, бироқ ушбу усулларни кейинчалик ҳам клиник валидация қилиш ва стандартлаштиришни талаб этади.
##plugins.themes.default.displayStats.downloads##
Havolalar
1. Agarwal A., Sharma R., Gupta S. et al. Standardized laboratory procedures, quality control and quality assurance are key requirements for accurate semen analysis in the evaluation of infertile male // World J Mens Health. — 2022. — Vol. 40, № 1. — P. 52–65.
2. Alduais Y., Alduais A., Zhang H. et al. Artificial intelligence (AI) approaches to male infertility in IVF: a mapping review // Eur J Med Res. — 2025. — Vol. 30. — Art. 215.
3. Almog B., Shrem G., Harlev A. et al. Adam sensor: a novel nocturnal penile tumescence wearable device — technology overview & applications // Sex Med Rev. — 2022. — Vol. 10, № 4. — P. 648–659.
4. Ayta I.A., McKinlay J.B., Krane R.J. The likely worldwide increase in erectile dysfunction between 1995 and 2025 and some possible policy consequences // BJU Int. — 1999. — Vol. 84, № 1. — P. 50–56.
5. Bachelot G., Lamaziere A., Czernichow S. et al. Machine learning approach to assess the association between anthropometric, metabolic, and nutritional status and semen parameters // Asian J Androl. — 2024. — Vol. 26, № 3. — P. 287–294.
6. Baturu M., Solakhan M., Kazaz T.G., Bayrak O. Frequently asked questions on erectile dysfunction: evaluating artificial intelligence answers with expert mentorship // Int J Impot Res. — 2024. — Vol. 36, № 5. — P. 489–495.
7. Cherouveim P., Velmahos C., Bormann C.L. Artificial intelligence for sperm selection — a systematic review // Fertil Steril. — 2023. — Vol. 120, № 1. — P. 24–31.
8. Cocci A., Pezzoli M., Lo Re M. et al. Quality of information and appropriateness of ChatGPT outputs for urology patients // Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. — 2023. — Vol. 27, № 2. — P. 320–325.
9. Davis R., Eppler M., Ayo-Ajibola O. et al. Evaluating the effectiveness of artificial intelligence-powered large language models application in disseminating appropriate and readable health information in urology // J Urol. — 2023. — Vol. 210, № 4. — P. 688–694.
10. Feng X., Wang R., Li X. et al. Construction of interpretable machine-learning diagnostic models for erectile dysfunction based on routine blood and biochemical detection data // Eur J Med Res. — 2025 (Epub ahead of print). doi: 10.1186/s40001-026-04118-0.
11. Geyik S., Yilmaz I.O., Zubaroglu M. et al. Prediction of severe erectile dysfunction after penile fracture repair: machine learning analysis results from the reconstruction and trauma working group of the society of urological surgery (RAT-SUS) // Sex Med. — 2025. — Vol. 13, № 1. — Art. qfaf101.
12. Haugen T.B., Witczak O., Hicks S.A. et al. Sperm motility assessed by deep convolutional neural networks into WHO categories // Sci Rep. — 2023. — Vol. 13. — Art. 8882.
13. Hershenhouse J.S., Cacciamani G.E. Comment on: Assessing ChatGPT's ability to answer questions pertaining to erectile dysfunction // Int J Impot Res. — 2024. — Vol. 36, № 3. — P. 298–299.
14. Huo B., Cacciamani G.E., Collins G.S. et al. Reporting standards for the use of large language model-linked chatbots for health advice // Nat Med. — 2023. — Vol. 29, № 12. — P. 2988–2990.
15. Karakaya A., Yildirim M., Çelik O. et al. Predicting semen analysis parameters from testicular ultrasonography images using deep learning algorithms: an innovative approach to male infertility diagnosis // J Urol. — 2025. — Vol. 213, № 2. — P. 234–242.
16. Kaya C., Ozturk M., Demir O. et al. Quality of chatbot responses to the most popular questions regarding erectile dysfunction: a comparative analysis // Andrologia. — 2024. — Vol. 56, № 8. — e14852.
17. Krausz C. Male infertility: pathogenesis and clinical diagnosis // Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. — 2011. — Vol. 25, № 2. — P. 271–285.
18. Kuroda S., Karna K.K., Kaiyal R.S. et al. Novel sperm chromatin dispersion test with artificial intelligence-aided halo evaluation: a comparison study with existing modalities // Andrology. — 2023. — Vol. 11, № 8. — P. 1581–1592.
19. Lewis K.C., Lam I., Nieb J. et al. Inconsistent adoption of World Health Organization V (2010) semen analysis reference ranges in the United States eight years after publication // Urology. — 2019. — Vol. 126. — P. 96–101.
20. Liu Y.S., Hankey J.R., Chokka S. et al. Individualized identification of sexual dysfunction of psychiatric patients with machine-learning // Sci Rep. — 2022. — Vol. 12, № 1. — Art. 9599.
21. Liu S., Zhao J., Wang Y. et al. Development and validation of a prediction model for erectile dysfunction using machine learning: according to NHANES 2001–2004 // Sci Rep. — 2024. — Vol. 14. — Art. 19748.
22. Lue T.F. Erectile dysfunction // N Engl J Med. — 2000. — Vol. 342, № 24. — P. 1802–1813.
23. Pan A., Musheyev D., Bockelman D. et al. Assessment of artificial intelligence chatbot responses to top searched queries about cancer // JAMA Oncol. — 2023. — Vol. 9, № 10. — P. 1437–1440.
24. Pan A., Musheyev D., Loeb S., Kabarriti A.E. Quality of erectile dysfunction information from ChatGPT and other artificial intelligence chatbots // BJU Int. — 2024. — Vol. 133, № 2. — P. 152–154.
25. Qin F., Gao L., Qian S. et al. Advantages and limitations of sleep-related erection and rigidity monitoring in diagnosis of erectile dysfunction // Andrologia. — 2022. — Vol. 54, № 5. — e14399.
26. Rajpurkar P., Chen E., Banerjee O., Topol E.J. AI in health and medicine // Nat Med. — 2022. — Vol. 28, № 1. — P. 31–38.
27. Razdan S., Siegal A.R., Brewer Y. et al. Assessing ChatGPT's ability to answer questions pertaining to erectile dysfunction: can our patients trust it? // Int J Impot Res. — 2024. — Vol. 36, № 7. — P. 734–740.
28. Russo G.I., Di Mauro M., Cocci A. et al. Consulting "Dr. Google" for sexual dysfunction: a contemporary worldwide trend analysis // Int J Impot Res. — 2020. — Vol. 32, № 4. — P. 455–461.
29. Saffati G., Ghanem H., Nguyen H.M.T. et al. Wearable penile devices: the TechRing // Transl Androl Urol. — 2025. — Vol. 14, № 1. — P. 114–122.
30. Santi D., Spaggiari G., Casonati A. et al. Multilevel approach to male fertility by machine learning highlights a hidden link between haematological and spermatogenetic cells // Andrology. — 2020. — Vol. 8, № 5. — P. 1021–1029.
31. Silva A.C., Martins Silva C., Morgado A. Erection hardness score or penile Doppler ultrasound: which is a better predictor of failure of nonsurgical treatment of erectile dysfunction? // Sex Med. — 2023. — Vol. 11, № 2. — Art. qfad009.
32. Singhal K., Azizi S., Tu T. et al. Large language models encode clinical knowledge // Nature. — 2023. — Vol. 620, № 7972. — P. 172–180.
33. Sng C.M.N., Wee L.M.C., Tang K.C. et al. Wearable soft microtube sensors for quantitative home-based erectile dysfunction monitoring // Sensors (Basel). — 2022. — Vol. 22, № 23. — Art. 9344.
34. Sng C.M.N., Wee L.M.C., Yeo J.C., Bhagat A.A.S. A comprehensive review of monitoring methods for erectile dysfunction diagnosis // Reprod Female Child Health. — 2024. — Vol. 3, № 2. — P. 65–81.
35. Taitson P.F. Artificial intelligence and male infertility // JBRA Assist Reprod. — 2025. — Vol. 29, № 2. — P. 341–347.
36. Teoman A.S., Serefoglu E.C., Kayis A.A. et al. Artificial intelligence-based clinical decision-making in erectile dysfunction: a narrative review // Curr Urol Rep. — 2024. — Vol. 26, № 1. — Art. 22.
37. Teoman A.S., Ates H., Keles A. et al. Responses of five different artificial intelligence chatbots to the top searched queries about erectile dysfunction: a comparative analysis // J Med Syst. — 2024. — Vol. 48, № 1. — Art. 45.
38. Venishetty N., Alkassis M., Raheem O.A. The role of artificial intelligence in male infertility: evaluation and treatment — a narrative review // Urology. — 2024. — Vol. 4. — P. 23–35.
39. Xiong Y., Zhang Y., Zhang F. et al. Applications of artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and prediction of erectile dysfunction: a narrative review // Int J Impot Res. — 2023. — Vol. 35, № 2. — P. 95–102.
40. Zhang Y., Liu G., Chen J. et al. A wearable adaptive penile rigidity monitoring system for assessment of erectile dysfunction // Microsyst Nanoeng. — 2024. — Vol. 10. — Art. 152.
41. Abbas S.A., Yusifzada I., Athar S. Revolutionizing medicine: chatbots as catalysts for improved diagnosis, treatment, and patient support // Cureus. — 2025. — Vol. 17, №3. — Art. e80935.
42. Geigle H., Schlotz W., Zarski A.C. Using a Telegram chatbot as cost-effective software infrastructure for ambulatory assessment studies with iOS and Android devices // Behav Res Methods. — 2021. — Vol. 53, №1. — P. 398–413.
43. Gunawan T.S., Babiker A.B.F., Ismail N. et al. Development of intelligent Telegram chatbot using natural language processing // 7th International Conference on Wireless and Telematics (ICWT). — 2021. — P. 1–5.
44. Schick A., Feine J., Morana S. et al. Validity of chatbot use for mental health assessment: experimental study // JMIR Ment Health. — 2022. — Vol. 9, №10. — Art. e28082.
45. Squires M., Tao X., Elangovan S. et al. Deep learning and machine learning in psychiatry: a survey of current progress in depression detection, diagnosis and treatment // Brain Inform. — 2023. — Vol. 10, №1. — Art. 10.
46. Talyshinskii A., Naik N., Hameed B.M.Z. et al. Potential of AI-driven chatbots in urology: revolutionizing patient care through artificial intelligence // Curr Urol Rep. — 2023. — Vol. 25, №1. — P. 1–10.
