RAQAMLI STOMATOLOGIYADA CAD/CAM TEXNOLOGIYALARIDAN FOYDALANISHNING KLINIK AFZALLIKLARI
Ключевые слова:
raqamli stomatologiya, CAD/CAM, intraoral skaner, chairside stomatologiya, keramik restavratsiya, marginal moslikАннотация
Maqolada raqamli stomatologiyada CAD/CAM (computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing) texnologiyalaridan foydalanishning klinik afzalliklari zamonaviy dalillar asosida tahlil qilinadi. Tadqiqot birlamchi klinik tajriba emas, balki 2021–2026-yillarda chop etilgan sistematik sharhlar, meta-tahlillar va O‘zbekiston mualliflarining raqamli stomatologiya bo‘yicha ilmiy ishlariga asoslangan ikkilamchi dalillar sintezidir. Intraoral scanning va to‘liq raqamli workflow ko‘p klinik holatlarda an’anaviy impressionga nisbatan ish vaqtini qisqartirishi va bemor komfortini yaxshilashi ko‘rsatilgan. 2026-yilgi implant-protez workflow meta-tahlilida to‘liq raqamli usul protsedura vaqtini o‘rtacha 4,28 minutga qisqartirgan. Marginal moslik bo‘yicha 2026-yilgi meta-tahlilda CAD/CAM va an’anaviy keramik kronlar o‘rtasida statistik ahamiyatli farq topilmagan (MD −2,3 μm; p=0,582), har ikki guruhda marginal gap klinik maqbul chegaralarda bo‘lgan. Uzoq muddatli klinik tadqiqotlar asosidagi meta-tahlilda CAD/CAM restavratsiyalarining taxminiy 5 yillik survival diapazoni 85,55–100%, 10 yillik survival diapazoni 71–100% deb baholangan. Natijalar CAD/CAM’ning asosiy klinik afzalligi “mutlaq aniqlik ustunligi”dan ko‘ra, standartlashtirilgan raqamli workflow, takrorlanuvchanlik, chairside vaqtni qisqartirish, raqamli arxivlash va bemor tajribasini yaxshilashda ekanini ko‘rsatadi.
##plugins.themes.default.displayStats.downloads##
Библиографические ссылки
1. Mangano, F., Gandolfi, A., Luongo, G., & Logozzo, S. (2021). Intraoral scanning reduces procedure time and improves patient comfort in fixed prosthodontics and implant dentistry: A systematic review. Clinical Oral Investigations. PMID: 34568955.
2. Ayres, G., Parize, H., Mendonça, L. M., Kubata, B. R., & Tirapelli, C. (2025). Is the digital workflow more efficient for manufacturing partial-coverage restorations? A systematic review. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 133(6), 1438–1447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.08.005
3. Clinical Effectiveness and Accuracy of Fully Digital Workflows Versus Conventional Methods in Implant-Supported Restorations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. (2026). Cureus. PMID: 41798445. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.102864
4. Marginal gap of ceramic crowns fabricated by CAD-CAM and conventional techniques: A systematic review and meta-analysis. (2026). Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. PMID: 42225536.
5. Reasons for Failure of CAD/CAM Restorations in Clinical Studies: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. (2023). Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice. PMID: 37272145. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3472
6. Revolutionizing dental restorations: Insights into computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing materials - A systematic review. (2026). Dental Research Journal. PMID: 41607733.
7. Advances in Chairside and Restorative Dental Materials: A Systematic Review of Material Properties, Adhesive Strategies, and Long-Term Performance. (2026). PMID: 42646184.
8. Jebali, C., Riahi, Z., Kalghoum, I., et al. (2025). Dental marginal adaptation of inlay/onlay restorations fabricated with digital and conventional techniques: A systematic review. Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice, 26(8), 806–813. PMID: 41145369.
9. Alikhodjaev, S., Shamsieva, O., Abdukhalimova, N., Sunnatov, D., Toirova, A., Yakubova, S., & Khatamov, U. (2025). Digital technologies in dentistry: Comprehensive advances in diagnostics, treatment planning, and prosthetic rehabilitation. International Journal of Medical Sciences. https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.ijms.125964
10. Jumayev, M. (2025). Digital prosthodontics for periodontal patients: Non-removable prostheses in modern clinical practice. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.ijai.88655
11. Pulatova, B., Batyrov, F., & Saidov, S. (2022). Использование 3-д моделирования для оказания дистанционной первой ортодонтической и ортопедической помощи детям с врождённой расщелиной верхней губы и нёба. Актуальные вопросы хирургической стоматологии и дентальной имплантологии. https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.dental-implantology.16865
12. Bashun, E., Nurieva, N., & Rizaeva, S. (2021). Преимущества и недостатки изготовления коронок длительного ношения методом 3D печати. Медицина и инновации. https://doi.org/10.34920/min.2021-3.016
13. Aminova, M. (2025). Innovative approaches to implantation and prosthetics in the maxillofacial area. International Journal of Medical Sciences.
14. Mukaddaskhonova, M. D., Pulatova, B. J., Khasanov, Sh. M., & Khasanov, I. I. (2022). Оптимизация хирургического этапа дентальной имплантации на основании компьютерного моделирования. Актуальные проблемы стоматологии и челюстно-лицевой хирургии 4. https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.problems-dentistry.15700
