THE ROLE OF VIRTUAL REALITY TECHNOLOGIES IN IMPROVING ANATOMY EDUCATION

Авторы

  • Gavharoy Yusupova Andijan Branch of Kokand University, Uzbekistan Автор

Ключевые слова:

virtual reality, anatomy education, medical students, three-dimensional visualization, medical education

Аннотация

Virtual reality is becoming an increasingly important educational technology in medical training, particularly in the teaching of human anatomy. Anatomy requires students to understand complex three-dimensional relationships among organs, vessels, nerves, muscles, bones, and anatomical spaces. Traditional teaching methods such as lectures, textbooks, atlases, plastic models, and cadaveric dissection remain essential, but they may be limited by access, time, cost, and the difficulty of repeated visualization. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of virtual reality technologies in improving anatomy education and to analyze their influence on spatial understanding, student engagement, knowledge retention, and clinical orientation. A literature-based analytical method was used to examine current evidence concerning immersive and non-immersive virtual reality systems in medical anatomy education. The findings indicate that virtual reality can improve visualization of complex structures, increase active participation, support repeated independent learning, and strengthen the connection between anatomical knowledge and clinical practice. However, virtual reality should be considered a complementary educational tool rather than a complete replacement for cadaveric dissection and traditional anatomy teaching. Its effectiveness depends on appropriate pedagogical integration, technical quality, instructor guidance, and alignment with learning objectives

##plugins.themes.default.displayStats.downloads##

##plugins.themes.default.displayStats.noStats##

Библиографические ссылки

1. Moro C, Štromberga Z, Raikos A, Stirling A. The effectiveness of virtual and augmented reality in health sciences and medical anatomy. Anatomical Sciences Education. 2017;10(6):549–559.

2. Yammine K, Violato C. A meta-analysis of the educational effectiveness of three-dimensional visualization technologies in teaching anatomy. Anatomical Sciences Education. 2015;8(6):525–538.

3. Hackett M, Proctor M. Three-dimensional display technologies for anatomical education: A literature review. Journal of Science Education and Technology. 2016;25:641–654.

4. Estai M, Bunt S. Best teaching practices in anatomy education: A critical review. Annals of Anatomy. 2016;208:151–157.

5. Barsom EZ, Graafland M, Schijven MP. Systematic review on the effectiveness of augmented reality applications in medical training. Surgical Endoscopy. 2016;30:4174–4183.

6. Nicholson DT, Chalk C, Funnell WRJ, Daniel SJ. Can virtual reality improve anatomy education? A randomized controlled study of a computer-generated three-dimensional anatomical ear model. Medical Education. 2006;40(11):1081–1087.

7. Zhao J, Xu X, Jiang H, Ding Y. The effectiveness of virtual reality-based technology on anatomy teaching: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. BMC Medical Education. 2020;20:127.

8. Ghosh SK. Cadaveric dissection as an educational tool for anatomical sciences in the 21st century. Anatomical Sciences Education. 2017;10(3):286–299.

9. Drake RL, Vogl AW, Mitchell AWM. Gray's Anatomy for Students. 5th ed. Elsevier; 2023.

10. Triepels CPR, Smeets CFA, Notten KJB, et al. Does three-dimensional anatomy improve student understanding? Clinical Anatomy. 2020;33(1):25–33.

Опубликован

2026-09-06